Summarize：www.chinabuses.org:
The Comparative Analysis of Sales Data of 2009 and 2008
Table One: the sales growth of buses in each length (Unit: vehicle)
|
|
Total
|
12＜L
|
11＜L≤12
|
10＜L≤11
|
9＜L≤10
|
|
2009
|
53581
|
1186
|
11449
|
12976
|
7437
|
|
2008
|
55353
|
2451
|
13445
|
12730
|
6777
|
|
year-to-year growth
|
-3.2
|
-51.6
|
-14.9
|
1.93
|
9.7
|
|
|
8＜L≤9
|
7＜L≤8
|
6＜L≤7
|
5＜L≤6
|
|
|
2009
|
8843
|
7960
|
3390
|
340
|
|
|
2008
|
8711
|
9201
|
1144
|
894
|
|
|
year-to-year growth
|
0.15
|
-13.5
|
196.3
|
-62
|
|
Chart One: the sales growth of buses in each length
Shown above:
It decreases 3.2% in buses in 2009, less almost 4 percent than the overall growth of 0.81% in bus market. This is also the first year with the decline for bus industry since 2000. It indicates the severe influence of the financial crisis on public transport market in 2009. In length, only 6～7-meter buses positively grow in sales with the speed of 196.3%. The growth of the rural transport market initially turns on. 5～6-meter buses fall most with the rate of 62.0% and then super large buses with 51.6%, 11～12-meter with 14.9%.
Analysis of Sales and Ranking of Top 15 Companies in Public Transport Market 2009
1. Sales and Production Ranking of Buses
The total production volume of top 15 bus manufacturers is 40,315 units, the accumulated sales volume is 39,797 units, the production concentration is 74.43% and the sales concentration is 74.27%. It all shows obvious decline in sales and production compared with the same period of last year. It indicates that there still does not exist the comparatively stable industry structures for public transport buses.
Table Two: the ranking table of the accumulated production and sales of buses
|
No.
|
Company
|
Output
|
Concentration ratio
|
Sales volume
|
Concentration ratio
|
|
1
|
Yutong
|
5810
|
10.7
|
5695
|
10.63
|
|
2
|
Hengtong
|
4007
|
7.4
|
3996
|
7.46
|
|
3
|
Higer
|
3997
|
7.38
|
3868
|
7.22
|
|
4
|
Sunwin
|
3098
|
5.72
|
3098
|
5.78
|
|
5
|
Kinglong
|
3044
|
5.62
|
3044
|
5.68
|
|
6
|
Yangtse
|
2622
|
4.84
|
2650
|
4.94
|
|
7
|
Youyi
|
2640
|
4.87
|
2628
|
4.9
|
|
8
|
Huanghai
|
2588
|
4.78
|
2472
|
4.61
|
|
9
|
Shaolin
|
2070
|
3.82
|
2044
|
3.81
|
|
10
|
Chengdu
|
2003
|
3.7
|
1972
|
3.68
|
|
11
|
Ankai
|
1842
|
3.4
|
1822
|
3.4
|
|
12
|
FAW
|
1695
|
3.1
|
1652
|
3.08
|
|
13
|
Yaxing
|
1637
|
3
|
1657
|
3.09
|
|
14
|
Chang'an
|
1713
|
3.16
|
1643
|
3.07
|
|
15
|
JAC
|
1549
|
2.86
|
1556
|
2.9
|
Chart Two: the ranking chart of the accumulated production and sales of buses
2. Sales Analysis of Large, Light and Medium Buses
In 2009, the accumulated sales volume of 50 bus companies is 53,581 units, including 25,611 large buses, accounting for 47.8%; 24,150 medium buses, 45.07%; 3,730 light buses, 6.96%. The accumulated sales volume of large buses of the top 15 companies is 22,094 units with the concentration rate of 86.27% and declines almost 4 percent over the same period. The accumulated sales volume of medium buses of the top 15 companies is 19,596 units with the concentration rate of 81.14% and increases 1.37 percent over the same period. The accumulated sales volume of light buses of the top 15 companies is 3,729 units with the concentration rate of 99.97%, rising over the same period.
Table Three: sales ranking of large buses ( Unit : vehicle)
| |
Company
|
Sales Volume
|
Concentration ratio
|
|
1
|
Yutong
|
2889
|
11.28
|
|
2
|
Sunwin
|
2699
|
10.54
|
|
3
|
Kinglong
|
2544
|
9.93
|
|
4
|
Yangtse
|
2306
|
9
|
|
5
|
Huanghai
|
2301
|
8.98
|
|
6
|
Hengtong
|
2120
|
8.27
|
|
7
|
Chengdu
|
1214
|
4.74
|
|
8
|
FAW
|
1214
|
4.74
|
|
9
|
Zhongtong
|
975
|
3.81
|
|
10
|
Quick
|
844
|
3.3
|
|
11
|
Yaxing
|
720
|
2.81
|
|
12
|
Ankai
|
703
|
2.74
|
|
13
|
Higer
|
633
|
2.47
|
|
14
|
Sunlong
|
539
|
2.1
|
|
15
|
Golden dragon
|
393
|
1.53
|
|
|
Total
|
22094
|
86.27
|
Chart Three: statistic chart of large buses
Table Four: sales ranking of medium buses (Unit : vehicle)
| |
Company
|
Sales volume
|
Concentration ratio
|
|
1
|
Higer
|
3235
|
13.4
|
|
2
|
Yutong
|
2806
|
11.62
|
|
3
|
Youyi
|
2628
|
10.9
|
|
4
|
Chang'an
|
1619
|
6.7
|
|
5
|
Hengtong
|
1437
|
5.95
|
|
6
|
JAC
|
1268
|
5.25
|
|
7
|
Shaolin
|
1219
|
5.05
|
|
8
|
Ankai
|
1119
|
4.63
|
|
9
|
Sunlong
|
969
|
4.01
|
|
10
|
Quick
|
676
|
2.8
|
|
11
|
Xiangfan
|
581
|
2.41
|
|
12
|
Yaxing
|
579
|
2.4
|
|
13
|
Golden dragon
|
507
|
2.1
|
|
14
|
Kinglong
|
500
|
2.07
|
|
15
|
FAW
|
453
|
1.88
|
|
|
Total
|
19596
|
81.14
|
Chart Four: statistic chart of medium buses
Table Five: sales ranking of minibuses (Unit : vehicle)
| |
Company
|
Sales volume
|
Concentration ratio
|
|
1
|
Anyuan
|
1107
|
4.58
|
|
2
|
Shaolin
|
611
|
2.53
|
|
3
|
Hengtong
|
439
|
1.82
|
|
4
|
Chengdu
|
330
|
1.37
|
|
5
|
Xiangfan
|
306
|
1.27
|
|
6
|
Shuchi
|
201
|
0.83
|
|
7
|
Yangtse
|
195
|
0.8
|
|
8
|
JAC
|
145
|
0.6
|
|
9
|
Nanjun
|
120
|
0.5
|
|
10
|
Dongte
|
91
|
0.38
|
|
11
|
Dongfeng
|
61
|
0.25
|
|
12
|
FAW
|
42
|
0.17
|
|
13
|
Yaxing
|
39
|
0.16
|
|
14
|
Chang'an
|
24
|
0.099
|
|
15
|
Bangle
|
18
|
0.075
|
|
|
Total
|
3729
|
99.97
|
Chart Five: statistic chart of minibuses
